Thoughts on that Subaru Toyota Thing
- I`m Batman
- Senior Member
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:14
- Location: Castle Rock
- RX-7 Chris
- Posts: 7800
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:14
- Location: Colorado Springs
- Contact:
I`m Batman wrote:It's the new AE86...? Is that why they call it GT86?
Yes it is.
1984 RX-7 GSL-SE [size=84]My restomod project[/SIZE]
1964 Ford Galaxie 500XL flat black w/ white interior, 2 dr fastback, 390 thunderbird, C6 auto, 2500 rpm high stall converter, shift kit, AC, Holley 750 cfm
[size=100]RIP 1983 RX-7[/SIZE]
My Car Blog
erod550 wrote:I'm sure they will. There's supposed to be a turbo version. Just waiting to see if it's WRX power levels or STi+ power levels.
The 2011-2012 WRX make about 5 to 10whp less than than the STi and about the same wtq. The VF52 on the new WRX is a bigger better turbo than the old td04. Maxes out in the 360whp/400wtq range @ 22psi. Would love to see a 2.5 turbo in the BRZ. Because of its weight the car would be an absolute rocket.
[color="RoyalBlue"]2012 WRX: Kinugawa TD05 20g @ 22psi/ E-bay downpipe/ FIC 900cc Injectors/ Walbro 255/ Torqued Performance Open Source Street Tune/[/color][color="Yellow"][SIZE="3"][color="Orange"]E85.[/color][/SIZE] [/color]
- speedjunkie
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5337
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:14
- Location: Colorado Springs
- Contact:
I think as long as it handles well that 200hp would be enough for some people. Miatas get the job done with less power, less weight and great handling, why can't this? But some will still want quite a bit more power. I believe they are going for this to be a sports car. I'm just happy there are more new RWD options out there again.
speedjunkie wrote:I think as long as it handles well that 200hp would be enough for some people.
Tell that to the RX8, RIP. Also, I know Miata owners like to classify them as sports cars, but they aren't really. Fun to drive? Absolutely, but sports cars to me means more than just good handling. Although I guess the newer Miatas do pack a bit more of a punch than the early gutless models like mine.
2015 Ironman Silver Veloster Turbo - Bone stock and staying that way
1990 Crystal White Miata - Beater - Bignose 1.6L Swap, Robbins Top w/Glass Window, E-Codes, Air Horns, Brembo Rotors
Former Rides:
2011 Kona Blue Mustang GT 5.0
2009 True Red Mazdaspeed3 GT
2005 Flame Red SRT-4
1990 Crystal White Miata - Beater - Bignose 1.6L Swap, Robbins Top w/Glass Window, E-Codes, Air Horns, Brembo Rotors
Former Rides:
2011 Kona Blue Mustang GT 5.0
2009 True Red Mazdaspeed3 GT
2005 Flame Red SRT-4
as far as a sports car go, its not about power. That muscle car and "super" car sales gimmicks. Light weight, decent power and excellent handling at a low price is what made many of the sports of old sell so well. Its rumored that these will start about 25,000. That just about 5,000 to high I would say. At that point, with options, you start touching the realm of other cars that out class it.
And the RX-8s failure is that it wasnt really anything. It wasnt quite a sports car, it wasnt quite a sedan, didnt have high power, which isnt an issue, but that was rewarded with crap fuel economy and a less than admirable record of reliability. All at a cost that was too high for what was offered.
And the RX-8s failure is that it wasnt really anything. It wasnt quite a sports car, it wasnt quite a sedan, didnt have high power, which isnt an issue, but that was rewarded with crap fuel economy and a less than admirable record of reliability. All at a cost that was too high for what was offered.
[color="RoyalBlue"]For current updates and event coverage check out[/color] [SIZE="3"]Whizbang Rally's Facebook[/SIZE]
Figured I'd chime in here. I used to own an AE86. It only had 112HP. The curb weight on those in its heaviest form was 2400lbs. I was beating Domestic muscle with ease in that thing with only 112HP. I remember upsetting a couple guys with the then popular Monte Carlo SS. But thats not where the car really shined. A curvy road was a treat to drive in that thing, and I wish I still had it to autocross in. So this new version weighs just a bit more with 200hp. I think it will be awesome. Also I have about 200HP in my KLZE Mazda MX-3 with a weight of 2580lbs and it is plenty fast for me. (If I could only get to be more reliable.) Never raced my MX-3 but others with the same basic setup would regularly beat 5.0 liter Mustangs in drags, but again in the curves my Mazda really shines. So yeah 200HP will be fine for a base model and I guarantee the aftermarket for these things will be huge so if you want more power pick your flavor of forced induction and you will have a really mean machine, and it looks awesome. My only complaint would be the price tag, a little pricy.
I think I'd be pretty happy with 200hp in that car. I figure my 2002 WRX is putting out about the same with 100k on it and that's a pretty fun car. The improved throttle response and low-end torque would make that thing plenty fun on the street given the low curb weight. That said, I would lust after a 300hp one....
- SecondGenPAt
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:14
- Location: Jincheon, South Korea
Whizbang and Silkwyrm hit the nail on the head. This is going to be a driver's car, not a speed freaks car. A true sports car in the sense: front engine rear wheel drive; nimble, responsive, easy to modify (relative), decent economy, and looks decent. This is not a car that will make up for lack of driving skill, but will reward smoothness and talent. As the saying goes: anyone can drive a fast car fast, but it takes skill to drive a slow car fast. The 2 main problems I see are: the price is just a little high and the flat 4.
The base model needs to come in around 18k so that this car can be put into the hands that want it the most.
The flat 4... I understand it from a dynamics and weight balance point, but not from a tuning point. This is going to be obscenely expensive to modify (relative to an inline engine) and I don't think the reliability is there for the general buyer. (unless they've got the oil burning from hard cornering under control) it will be interesting to see how these engines handle autox and track day abuse.
This car really needed an aluminum inline 4 available as an option, but my opinion.
After that, I can say I'm excited for this car, Don't think I'll ever own one, as RX7's have that place for me, but this will be a great car.
The base model needs to come in around 18k so that this car can be put into the hands that want it the most.
The flat 4... I understand it from a dynamics and weight balance point, but not from a tuning point. This is going to be obscenely expensive to modify (relative to an inline engine) and I don't think the reliability is there for the general buyer. (unless they've got the oil burning from hard cornering under control) it will be interesting to see how these engines handle autox and track day abuse.
This car really needed an aluminum inline 4 available as an option, but my opinion.
After that, I can say I'm excited for this car, Don't think I'll ever own one, as RX7's have that place for me, but this will be a great car.
Hakuna Matata
- speedjunkie
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5337
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:14
- Location: Colorado Springs
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests


