Quality FD Manifold Interest?

Talk about your Rotaries!
User avatar
speedjunkie
Senior Member
Posts: 5365
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:14
Location: Colorado Springs
Contact:

Postby speedjunkie » Sat Dec 31, 2011 9:14

I think you might be onto something there Eduardo. I like the sturdy block off plate too.


WOOOOOOW. LOL!!!!
Image

User avatar
chickenwafer
Posts: 2515
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:14
Location: Greeley

Postby chickenwafer » Sat Dec 31, 2011 9:14

Throw some exhaust wrap on it and no one would ever know! haha
:eek:

User avatar
speedjunkie
Senior Member
Posts: 5365
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:14
Location: Colorado Springs
Contact:

Postby speedjunkie » Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:14

^I would. That's enough for me to not do it. LOL
Image

User avatar
speedjunkie
Senior Member
Posts: 5365
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:14
Location: Colorado Springs
Contact:

Postby speedjunkie » Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:14

http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/showpost.php?p=178500&postcount=6

THIS manifold is exactly what I'm going for. This is crazy. Check out the build in general though, especially the fuel setup.

http://rotarycarclub.com/rotary_forum/showthread.php?t=15257
Image

User avatar
D Walker
Senior Member
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:14
Location: Aurora

Postby D Walker » Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:14

That is exactly what I quoted you, RB flange, dual gates, simple setup. Yep
1986 Turbo FC race car, S6 13b, GOOPY Apex seals etc, GT35R, AEM EMS, lots more good stuff

RX8 World Chalenge Touring Car #7
RX8 World Challenge Touring Car #8

User avatar
speedjunkie
Senior Member
Posts: 5365
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:14
Location: Colorado Springs
Contact:

Postby speedjunkie » Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:14

^Well I'd never seen how short the runners could be, but I was hoping for something like that. He also said he doesn't have any issues with oil drainage either.

I've talked with someone in C Springs about doing it actually. We're going to use 321 SS. I'm pretty stoked haha. I'd like to plumb it back into the DP too, but I'm concerned about the difficulty in removal and reinstallation. Not to mention the price. Wow.
Image

User avatar
D Walker
Senior Member
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:14
Location: Aurora

Postby D Walker » Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:14

just MHO, but make sure whoever is doing it for you uses a RB flange.

Generically, unless there is a specific reason you have to, its best to not re-introduce the wg exhuast back into the exhaust stream.
1986 Turbo FC race car, S6 13b, GOOPY Apex seals etc, GT35R, AEM EMS, lots more good stuff



RX8 World Chalenge Touring Car #7

RX8 World Challenge Touring Car #8

User avatar
speedjunkie
Senior Member
Posts: 5365
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:14
Location: Colorado Springs
Contact:

Postby speedjunkie » Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:14

By RB do you mean Racing Beat? I was actually looking at those myself haha. The RB flange is 304 and I'll be using 321, is there a problem with that? I'm assuming not because the one in the thread I posted is made the same way. I'm just curious.

Why is it better NOT to plumb it back in? That's how I have mine now actually. I just wanted it to be quieter is all. Maybe I'll put a little muffler on each one haha.
Image

User avatar
D Walker
Senior Member
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:14
Location: Aurora

Postby D Walker » Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:14

Thats way too much to type at this time of night, will answer you in the AM, and after coffee...
1986 Turbo FC race car, S6 13b, GOOPY Apex seals etc, GT35R, AEM EMS, lots more good stuff



RX8 World Chalenge Touring Car #7

RX8 World Challenge Touring Car #8

User avatar
speedjunkie
Senior Member
Posts: 5365
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:14
Location: Colorado Springs
Contact:

Postby speedjunkie » Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:14

Haha alright that's cool. Thanks!
Image


Return to “Rotary Vehicle”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests