Just to clarify. All numbers today WERE corrected for ALTITUDE.
The atmospheric correction for today was 1.27. That means that the air was 27% less dense than it would be on a 70 degree day at sea level.
NA cars lose EXACTLY 27% of their power between here and sea level in this situation.
Turbo cars not so much. There is a bit of grey voodoo science involved in turbo pressure ratio efficiencies and what not...
What we have found is that taking the atmospheric correction and cutting it in half (then rounding down if we need to) yields very good approximate corrected numbers for most turbo cars. We have had several people test on our dyno, and then an identical dyno at sea level... and the correction math holds up very well.
NA cars need to take your final numbers and multiply by .73 to get your true uncorrected "in the room" numbers that your car put down to the rollers.
Turbo cars need to take your final number and multiply by .87 to get uncorrected numbers.
To get your dyno jet CORRECTED numbers... calculate your raw un-corrected power. Then multiply by 1.41
The 1.41 thing is a very accurate number from what we have found. Usually within 2% of a dyno jet.
The altitude corrected numbers that come off our dyno are approximately what a Dyno Jet (MAC) reads un-corrected. Most other dyno's out there read much higher than they should.
Take the numbers off our dyno, plug them into a 1/4 mile calculator with the weight of a vehicle and it will be VERY close to the real world trap speeds. Dyno jet numbers... not so much.
It was really great meeting everyone today. Always nice to see some fresh faces and answer tech questions.
You guys did have your shit together. I've never seen a dyno day go that smoothly. We're typically only able to do 15-20 cars in a day MAX... and the last few cars are in the dark.
I'm sad that nobody took a swing at beating my Forza ring time
